Places in the Bible Today:

Habor

Data

Translated NamesHabor, Habor River
Typeriver
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

1 Identification

  1. Khabur River (modern): 90% confidence
    1. panorama of the Khabur RiverKhabur River

Verses (3)

  1. 2Kgs 17:6, 18:11
  2. 1Chr 5:26

Linked Data Identifiers

SourceIdentifier
Logos FactbookHabor
OpenBible.info (2007)Habor
OpenBible.infoaf19252 (Habor)
TIPNRHabor@2Ki.17.6
UBS Names Databaseot ID_970
WikidataQ685344

Sources

  1. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Habor (place)
  2. Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land (1990): Habor
  3. Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Habor
  4. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  5. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Habor
  6. Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Habor
  7. HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (2011): Habor
  8. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Habor
  9. Lexham Bible Dictionary (2016): Habor
  10. Monson, Regions on the Run (2009): map 1
  11. Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2014): Habor
  12. New Bible Dictionary (1996): Habor
  13. New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
  14. New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988)
  15. Oxford Bible Atlas, Fourth Edition (2007)
  16. Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Habor
  17. Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Habor River
  18. Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Habor
  19. Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
  20. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
  21. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): 2Kgs 17:6
  22. Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas (1972): page 119

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (conneceted by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Bertramz

About

This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.