Places in the Bible Today:
Nephtoah
Data
| Translated Names | Nephtoah, Waters of Nephtoah |
|---|---|
| Type | spring |
| Geo Data |
KML (for Google Earth) GeoJSON (for GIS applications) |
1 Identification
Verses (2)
Linked Data Identifiers
| Source | Identifier |
|---|---|
| Biblemapper.com | 718 |
| Logos Factbook | Nephtoah |
| OpenBible.info (2007) | Nephtoah |
| OpenBible.info | ac1fef1 (Nephtoah) |
| TIPNR | Nephtoah@Jos.15.9 |
| UBS Names Database | ot ID_2002 |
| Wikidata | Q2599091 |
Sources
- Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 440
- Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Nephtoah (place)
- Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Nephtoah
- Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Nephtoah
- Baly, The Geography of the Bible (1974): page 178
- Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
- Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Nephtoah
- ESV Bible Atlas (2010)
- Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Nephtoah (Waters of)
- HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (2011): Nephtoah
- Hess, Joshua (1996): table 10
- Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
- International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Nephtoah
- IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Josh 15:5b-11
- McKinny, Historical Geography of the Administrative Division of Judah (2014): page 63
- Monson, Regions on the Run (2009): map 7
- New Bible Dictionary (1996): Nephtoah
- New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
- Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Nephtoah
- Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Nephtoah, Waters of
- Tübingen Bible Atlas (2001): Nephto
- Woudstra, Joshua (1981): 15:9-11
- Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Nephtoah, Waters of
- Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): Josh 15:5
Confidence Trends over Time
This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Thumbnail Image Credits
About
This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.