Places in the Bible Today:
Riblah 1
Data
| Translated Names | Diblah, Diblath, Riblah |
|---|---|
| Type | settlement |
| Geo Data |
KML (for Google Earth) GeoJSON (for GIS applications) |
1 Identification
Verses (11)
- 1Sam-Esth (4)
- 2Kgs 23:33, 25:6, 25:20, 25:21
- Job-Mal (7)
- Jer 39:5, 39:6, 52:9, 52:10, 52:26, 52:27
- Ezek 6:14
Linked Data Identifiers
| Source | Identifier |
|---|---|
| Biblemapper.com | 823 |
| Logos Factbook | Riblah (of Hamath) |
| OpenBible.info (2007) | Riblah 1 |
| OpenBible.info | ab2bde8 (Riblah 1) |
| TIPNR | Riblah@2Ki.23.33 |
| UBS Names Database | ot ID_2664, ot ID_786 |
| Wikidata | Q7322376 |
Sources
- Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 441
- Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Riblah (place)
- Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land (1990): Riblah
- Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Riblah
- Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Riblah
- ESV Bible Atlas (2010)
- Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Riblah
- Hammond Atlas of the Bible Lands (2007): Riblah
- HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (2011): Riblah
- International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Riblah
- IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Jer 39:5
- Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2014): Riblah
- New Bible Dictionary (1996): Riblah, Riblath
- New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
- New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988)
- Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Riblah
- Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Riblah
- Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Riblah
- Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Riblah
- Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): Jer 39:5
- Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas (1972): page 154
Confidence Trends over Time
This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Places with Similar Names
Thumbnail Image Credits
Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019
About
This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.