Places in the Bible Today:
Aznoth-tabor
Data
| Translated Names | Aznoth-tabor, Aznoth Tabor |
|---|---|
| Type | settlement |
| Geo Data |
KML (for Google Earth) GeoJSON (for GIS applications) |
1 Identification
Verses (1)
Josh 19:34
Linked Data Identifiers
| Source | Identifier |
|---|---|
| Biblemapper.com | 206 |
| Logos Factbook | Aznoth-Tabor |
| OpenBible.info (2007) | Aznoth-tabor |
| OpenBible.info | a9fd165 (Aznoth-tabor) |
| TIPNR | Aznoth-tabor@Jos.19.34 |
| UBS Names Database | ot ID_127 |
| Wikipedia | Aznoth-tabor (redirect) |
Sources
- Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 431
- Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Aznoth-tabor (place)
- Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Aznoth-tabor
- Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
- Expositor’s Bible Commentary (1984): Josh 19:34
- Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
- Monson, Regions on the Run (2009): map 5
- New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988): Aznoth-tabor
- Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Aznoth-tabor
- Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Aznoth-tabor
- Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
Confidence Trends over Time
This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Thumbnail Image Credits
Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019
About
This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.