Places in the Bible Today:

Dophkah

Data

Translated NameDophkah
Typesettlement
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

1 Identification

  1. Serabit el Khadim (modern): 45% confidence
    1. ruins at Serabit el KhadimSerabit el Khadim

Verses (2)

Num 33:12, 33:13

Linked Data Identifiers

SourceIdentifier
Biblemapper.com363
Logos FactbookDophkah
OpenBible.info (2007)Dophkah
OpenBible.infoa070c7b (Dophkah)
TIPNRDophkah@Num.33.12
UBS Names Databaseot ID_832
WikidataQ5297313

Sources

  1. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Dophkah (place)
  2. Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land (1990): Dophkah
  3. Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Dophkah
  4. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  5. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Dophkah
  6. Expositor’s Bible Commentary (1984): Exod 16:1-3
  7. Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Dophkah
  8. Hammond Atlas of the Bible Lands (2007): Dophkah
  9. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
  10. IVP Atlas of Bible History (2006): Dophkah
  11. IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Exod 16:1-3
  12. Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Dophkah
  13. Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Dophkah
  14. Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Dophkah
  15. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
  16. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): Num 33:1-56 Cycle 2
  17. Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas (1972): page 66

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Einsamer Schütze

About

This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.